Prosecutors fail to deliver justice on Chee Gaik Yap’s case

Nationwide signature campaign to petition against High Court’s acquittal and discharge of suspect.

Reeling in from the shock and anger over the prosecution team to provide a prima facie case against a rape and murder suspect, civil societies, state and national leaders all helped collect signatures and make police reports nationwide to urge the Attorney-General’s Chamber file an appeal in 14 days. Today is the eighth day.

A free man now, Shahril Jaafar was discharged and acquitted by the Alor Setar High Court last Thursday. Shahril had absconded to Perth in 2006 while out on bail during trial. He was only apprehended by the police when he landed at the Subang Airport in January 2012.

RELATED LINK

50,000 Signatures sought for Chee Gaik Yap

According to the Section 388 (1) of the Criminal Code of Procedures (CPC), it states that::

When any person accused of any non-bailable offence is arrested or detained without warrant by a police officer or appears or is brought before a Court, he may be released on bail by the officer in charge of the police district or by that Court, but he shall not be so released if there appears reasonable grounds for believing that he has been guilty of an offence punishable with death or imprisonment for life…

With such clear regulations, why then was an accused man suspected of both rape and murder allowed bail? Is it because he is the son of a prominent figure? And why was he only charged with murder and not rape as well?

As a woman, I feel totally appalled and rebuke the incompetence of the law enforcers in administering justice in this case. Have law practitioners forgotten their duties to protect their citizens?

How can we expect the streets to be safe when the odds are stacked against the victim and the system flawed? Despite conflicting public opinion, official statistics released by the government always claim that crime rate in the country have gone down.

Not unlike a direct contradiction, three strikingly high-profiled cases of home burglary were reported within the last two months. One was the home belonging to the sister of Deputy Prime Minister Muhyiddin, at SS3 Petaling Jaya. Another break-in happened in Mantin, Negeri Sembilan, home to the sister of Inspector-General of Police, Khalid Abu Bakar; and the latest, at Bukit Damansara, home of Khairy Jamaluddin, Minister for Youth and Sports.

“This incident is a reminder to us all that crime is a serious problem in our country. It is a real issue and not just merely a perception,” said Khairy Jamaluddin, admitting the severity of crime in the country.

Judicial Commissioner Zaki Abdul Wahab ruled that there was insufficient evidence to prove that the accused killed the victim, Chee Gaik Yap, who was then only 25 years old. The DNA in the semen found on the victim did not completely match that of the accused, as there might be a third person involved, Zaki elaborated as he read out his judgment.

With lop-sided and partisan structures within the judiciary and legislature, it is little wonder that stained mattresses and three-day old evidences left up in the nether region orifices can be presented in court as sufficient evidence to incriminate someone while the brutal and depraved criminals go scot-free, and the lack of evidence cited.

How can we entrust our safety and lives to an authority that treats serious crimes with a lackadaisical and indifferent attitude? Malaysian Crime Watch Task Force (MyWatch) insisted on June 25 that the Deputy IGP, Mohd Bakri Zini should clarify crime statistics.

“Serious crimes such as criminal intimidation, abduction, extortion and causing grievous hurt are classified as non-indexed crimes, which are not included in the national crime statistics,” MyWatch revealed, and stressed the need to ascertain if this was the normal practice by the Interpol and neighbouring countries.

If 50,000 signatures still fail to persuade the Attorney-General to rise to the occasion and make good an opportunity for reparation towards the family of Chee Gaik Yap, the public are then forced to agglomerate yet another example of the severe abortion of the law, to the likes of Teoh Beng Hock, Kugan and many others.

For now, we can only hope and pray. Tomorrow, any one of us can be the next victim.

Link to article in MSN

Link to photo gallery at MSN

Hello Kitty proves action speaks louder than words

Hello Kitty proves action speaks louder than words

Hello Kitty does not have a mouth. She speaks with her heart.

Worldwide novelty ‘Hello Kitty’ had Singaporeans queuing up and tussling over a limited edition toy kitten dressed in skeleton outfit from a German fairy tale known as ‘The Singing Bones’. McDonald’s Singapore sold the toy, as the last in a series of six, which began early June. The last frenzy was Hello Kitty dressed in wedding attire in 2000.

Despite having stocked up on 40% more on collectible Hello Kitty toys this year and limiting each customer to only 4 toys each, McDonald’s claim that the response for the Fairy Tale series had been overwhelming.

The fast-food chain announced last Thursday that the iconic toy had been sold out, much to the disappointment and frustration of many enthusiastic collectors who braved the haze in an attempt to get their hands on the plush toy.

Singapore wasn't the only country bogged by this phenomenon. Malaysia at one point was hit by the Hello Kitty fever in the 90’s. People argued over toys, jumped queues and made a commotion when the collectible went out of stock. Why do people react in such a way? Admittedly, these toys fetch a high resale value.

The toys were sold at S$4.60 (US$3.63) each but resellers are putting out bids at eBay, some starting from as high as US$79.90. ‘Stomp’ Singapore, an online urban lifestyle website reported last week that the winning bid was S$126,000 (US$99,471) for a set of the Fairy Tale series which includes the skeleton outfit kitty.

McDonald’s Singapore in its Facebook page declared disapproval of resellers profiting from the highly sought after collector’s item but is unable to do much beyond removing adverts from their page and admonishing their staff to misappropriation.

Although crazed fans sought out these memorabilia not unlike hysteria, some people are not even aware of it and termed it as an “outlandishly childish” display.

Hello from Japan

7-11 convenient stores nationwide in Malaysia are currently having a Hello Kitty promotion to collect 20 different trinkets and a chance to win entry tickets into the Hello Kitty Town in Johor. The promotion ends on 8 September 2013. Selected outlets also carry Hello Kitty bracelets priced at RM15.90 (US$5).

Presently there are three Hello Kitty theme parks in the world – Sanrio Puroland in Tokyo; Harmonyland in Kyushu; and Sanrio Hello Kitty Town, within the Puteri Harbour Theme Park in Johor, Malaysia. Sanrio Hello Kitty Town is the only character theme park located outside of Japan. Puteri Harbour Theme Park houses Legoland as well.

In Taiwan, there is a Hello Kitty themed restaurant and a maternity hospital too.

The Hello Kitty trademark also expanded into the wine market in 2009 to engage adult fans. Other than that, Hello Kitty can also be found in TV shows, video games and music.

Hello Kitty corporate partners include EVA Airways, Taiwan. In October 2005, EVA air launched a commercial passenger plane dubbed Hello Kitty Jet in an attempt to boost the declining tourism industry in the country. While the original Hello Kitty Jet retired in 2009, EVA reintroduced three Hello Kitty jets in 2011 to mark the carrier’s 20^th anniversary. In 2012, two more A330 Hello Kitty jets were added to ply the skies, dubbed ‘Hello Kitty Speed Puff’ and ‘Hello Kitty Happy Music’.

Hello Kitty products are sold worldwide through franchise stores and partner businesses. Besides genuine and licensed Sanrio products, Hello Kitty and friends have been spotted on many unofficial items, acknowledging that imitation is indeed the best form of flattery.

Sales of Hello Kitty merchandise account for more than half of its total turnover of about US$1 billion. Sanrio is currently listed in Japan’s Nikkei and was last traded at US$48.05 during closing on June 29.

The Hello Kitty Story

Hello Kitty by Sanrio was created by Japanese designer, Yuko Shimizo in 1974 and was brought over to the USA in 1976. The moon-faced white kitty with a pink bow first made her first appearance on a vinyl purse and was targeted at pre-teen girls. Sanrio provided Hello Kitty with a British identity together with a birthdate, November 1, an identical twin sister named Mimmy, and a hobby of baking cookies.  In 2008, Hello Kitty was appointed as Japan’s tourism ambassador to Hong Kong, China and South Korea. The adorable cat is also, since 1983, the United States children’s ambassador for Unicef.

According to Sanrio, the Hello Kitty trademark adorns 50,000 different products, ranging from fashion like bags, accessories, and clothing to stationaries for school and office; and decorative and electronic items for home and kitchen. It caters to audiences for mass market items to rare collectibles.

Hello Kitty was created based on an inspiration from Lewis Carrol’s ‘Through the Looking Glass’. In a scene at the beginning of the book, main character Alice played with a kitten named Kitty. Though simplistic looking, the kawaii Japanese pop-culture is appealing and has certainly made its mark in the world. Even without a mouth, Hello Kitty speaks volume.

Ode on disability by Carolyn Khor

I have eyes that see

But I see a world of suffering;

I have ears that hear

But all I hear is crying;

I have hands that touch

But I reach not those in pain;

So what use is it then?

That I can smell and taste

When,

If I don’t have eyes

I feel with my heart;

If I don’t have ears

I listen with my heart;

If I don’t have hands

I give with my heart;

Then,

Only then,

I can smell the joys of life

And taste the beauty of living.

Pray tell, who is disabled?

So,
Take my sight
Take my hearing
Take my touch
But leave me be my heart.

by Carolyn Khor

July 2, 2013